- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-434/21: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2022 — TO v EEA (Civil service — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Decision which was not contested in time — Res judicata — Conditional undertaking given by the AECC in the context of a favourable out-of-court settlement — Settlement offer not accepted by the applicant — No act adversely affecting the applicant — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0434
62021TB0434
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.4.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 165/34
(Case T-434/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Decision which was not contested in time - Res judicata - Conditional undertaking given by the AECC in the context of a favourable out-of-court settlement - Settlement offer not accepted by the applicant - No act adversely affecting the applicant - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 165/43)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: TO (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
Defendant: European Environment Agency (represented by: O. Cornu, acting as Agent, supported by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, in the first place, annulment of the decision of 21 September 2020 by which the EEA, (i) refused to comply with the judgment of the Court of 11 June 2019, TO v EEA (T-462/17, not published, EU:T:2019:397) and (ii) rejected the requests made by the applicant on 16 September 2020 and, in the second place, an order requiring the EEA to pay the applicant, (i) the sum corresponding to the compensation in lieu of notice and the installation allowance, together with interest as from 22 September 2016, (ii) the sum of EUR 20 000 in compensation for the alleged non-material damage suffered on account of the disclosure of her personal data to third parties and (iii) the sum of EUR 20 000 in compensation for the alleged non-material damage suffered on account of the refusal to disclose to her the correspondence exchanged with her previous counsel both before and after the delivery of that judgment.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Orders TO to pay, in addition to her own costs, those incurred by the European Environment Agency (EEA).
Language of the case: French.
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 349 of 30.8.2021.