- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-714/16: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2017 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Revocation of the contested decision — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0714
62016TB0714
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.4.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 121/34
(Case T-714/16)(1)
((EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Revocation of the contested decision - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 121/51)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Asolo LTD (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: W. Pors, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and M. Capostagno, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria) (represented by: A. Renck, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 July 2016 (Case R 282/2015-5), relating to cancellation proceedings between Red Bull and Asolo.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Asolo LTD and Red Bull GmbH.
(1) OJ C 462, 12.12.2016.