EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-10/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 31 March 2011 Hecq v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Social security — Meeting of 100 % of medical costs — Implied rejection decision — No decision recognising the occupational origin of the illness — Limited power of the administration — Decision to reject the complaint — Decision not purely confirmatory — No complaint — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010FB0010

62010FB0010

March 31, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/52

(Case F-10/10)(<span class="super">1</span>)

(Staff case - Officials - Social security - Meeting of 100 % of medical costs - Implied rejection decision - No decision recognising the occupational origin of the illness - Limited power of the administration - Decision to reject the complaint - Decision not purely confirmatory - No complaint - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 252/112

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: André Hecq (Chaumont-Gistoux, Belgium) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents, assisted by J.-L. Fagnart, lawyer)

Subject-matter of the case

Application for annulment of the decision dismissing a claim for 100 % reimbursement of various medical costs.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as in part clearly unfounded and in part clearly inadmissible.

2.Mr Hecq is ordered to pay the whole of the costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010, p. 70.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia