I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2020/C 371/26)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, and P. Ruess, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vieta Audio, SA (Barcelona, Spain)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Vita — European Union trade mark No 9 993 361
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 June 2020 in Case R 425/2020-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.