- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-314/11 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 December 2012 — European Commission v Planet AE (Appeals — Protection of the financial interests of the European Union — Identification of the level of risk associated with an entity — Early warning system — OLAF investigation — Decisions — Requests for activation of W1a and W1b warnings — Reviewable measures — Admissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CA0314
62011CA0314
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.2.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 46/6
(Case C-314/11 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeals - Protection of the financial interests of the European Union - Identification of the level of risk associated with an entity - Early warning system - OLAF investigation - Decisions - Requests for activation of W1a and W1b warnings - Reviewable measures - Admissibility)
2013/C 46/11
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and F. Dintilhac, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Planet AE (represented by: V. Christianos, dikigoros)
Re:
Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 April 2011 in Case T-320/09 Planet AE v Commission dismissing the plea of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission in an action for the annulment of Commission decisions, taken following investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), to activate, in the early warning system (EWS), a ‘W1a’ registration and subsequently a ‘W1b’ registration, identifying the level of risk associated with the applicant as a party awarded a public service contract concerning a project for institutional and sectoral modernisation in Syria, funded under the MEDA programme (OJ 2005 S 203-199730).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.