- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-119/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 6 October 2015 — FE v Commission (Civil service — Recruitment — Open competition — Inclusion on the reserve list — Decision of the appointing authority not to recruit a successful candidate — Respective jurisdictions of the selection board and of the appointing authority — Eligibility criteria for the competition — Minimum period of professional experience required — Methods of calculation — Manifest error of assessment by the selection board — None — Loss of an opportunity to be recruited — Compensation)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FA0119
62014FA0119
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.11.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 381/63
(Case F-119/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil service - Recruitment - Open competition - Inclusion on the reserve list - Decision of the appointing authority not to recruit a successful candidate - Respective jurisdictions of the selection board and of the appointing authority - Eligibility criteria for the competition - Minimum period of professional experience required - Methods of calculation - Manifest error of assessment by the selection board - None - Loss of an opportunity to be recruited - Compensation))
(2015/C 381/89)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: FE (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision ending the procedure initiated with a view to appointing the applicant — included on a reserve list for a competition — as an official, after informing him that the DG concerned had given its approval for his engagement, and finally finding that he had insufficient professional experience.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decision of 17 December 2013 by which the European Commission refused to recruit FE;
2.Orders the European Commission to pay FE the sum of EUR 10 000;
3.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
4.Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by FE.
Language of the case: French
(1) OJ C 7, 12.1.2015, p. 56.