- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-414/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 — Bolloré v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Cartels — Market in carbonless paper — Attributability of liability to the parent company for the infringement committed by its subsidiary — Direct participation of the parent company in the infringement — Equal treatment — Duration of the administrative procedure and legal proceedings — Reasonable period of time — Rights of the defence)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CA0414
62012CA0414
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.6.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 202/4
(Case C-414/12 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Appeal - Competition - Cartels - Market in carbonless paper - Attributability of liability to the parent company for the infringement committed by its subsidiary - Direct participation of the parent company in the infringement - Equal treatment - Duration of the administrative procedure and legal proceedings - Reasonable period of time - Rights of the defence))
2014/C 202/04
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Bolloré (represented by: P. Gassenbach, C. Lemaire and O. de Juvigny, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and N. Coutrelis, lawyer)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2012 in Case T-372/10 Bolloré v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment or amendment of Commission Decision C (2010) 4160 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFUE and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/36.212 — Carbonless paper) — Decision taken following annulment of a first decision — Attribution of liability for the infringement to the parent company as direct perpetrator — Fine — Lawfulness of infringements and penalties — Equal treatment — Reasonable period of time — Rights of the defence
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Bolloré to pay the costs of the present appeal.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.