- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-29/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel (Luxembourg) lodged on 18 January 2010 — Heiko Koelzsch v État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CN0029
62010CN0029
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.3.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 80/16
(Case C-29/10)
2010/C 80/30
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Heiko Koelzsch
Defendant: État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg
Questions referred
Is the rule of conflict in Article 6(2)(a) of the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations, which states that an employment contract is governed by the law of the country in which the employee habitually carries out his work in performance of the contract, to be interpreted as meaning that, in the situation where the employee works in more than one country, but returns systematically to one of them, that country must be regarded as that in which the employee habitually carries out his work?
Language of the case: French.
Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980 (OJ 1980 L 266, p. 1).