EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (single Judge) of 29 June 2004. # Joëlle Hivonnet v Council of the European Union. # Officials - Education allowance - Criteria for granting - Primary schooling - Nursery school. # Case T-188/03.

ECLI:EU:T:2004:194

62003TJ0188

June 29, 2004
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Officials – Education allowance – Criteria for granting – Primary schooling – Nursery school)

Full text in French II - 0000

Application: for annulment of the decision of the Council refusing to grant the applicant the education allowance for her daughter for the nursery school years 1999/2000 and 2000/01 and only granting that allowance on an exceptional basis for the nursery school year 2001/02, and a claim for compensation seeking payment of default interest on the sums corresponding to those allowances and damages for the non-pecuniary damage suffered as a result of that decision.

Held: The application is dismissed. The parties are ordered to bear their own costs.

Summary

(Staff Regulations, Art. 91(1))

(Staff Regulations, Annex VII, Art. 3)

Granting the education allowance to an official on an exceptional basis does not constitute a decision which restricts the rights of that official at present. Only if the exceptional nature of the decision were put forward subsequently as a ground for refusing to grant the allowance would the decision adversely affect the official concerned.

(see para. 16)

See: 204/85 Stroghili v Court of Auditors [1987] ECR 389, paras 6 and 11

However, in the absence of any criteria in the Staff Regulations to define that concept, reference should be made to the type of schooling provided, as defined by the national authorities.

(see paras 28-29)

See: T‑10/90 et T‑31/90 Boessen v ESC [1991] ECR II‑1365, paras 30 to 34

(see para. 45)

See: 264/83 Delhez v Commission [1986] ECR 2749, paras 20 and 23

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia