- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-138/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 20 July 2016 — Polizzi v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposal to add years of pensionable service — Act not having an adverse effect — Inadmissibility of the action — Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case — Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FB0138
62014FB0138
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 364/53
(Case F-138/14) (*)
((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Proposal to add years of pensionable service - Act not having an adverse effect - Inadmissibility of the action - Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case - Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure))
(2016/C 364/69)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Rosalba Polizzi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision to calculate the applicant’s pension rights in the context of the transfer of those rights to the European Union pension scheme, which decision applies the new general implementing provisions relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Ms Rosalba Polizzi shall bear her own costs and is ordered to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(*) Language of the case: French.
OJ C 34, 2.2.2015, p. 55.