EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-185/20: Order of the General Court of 1 December 2020 — Tikal Marine Systems v EUIPO — Ultra Safety Systems (Tikal Tef-Gel) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0185

62020TB0185

December 1, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/51

(Case T-185/20) (*)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

(2021/C 35/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tikal Marine Systems GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany) (represented by: M. Mahnkopf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ultra Safety Systems Inc. (Magonia Park, Florida, United States) (represented by: C. Eckhartt, A. von Mühlendahl and P. Böhner, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 January 2020 (Case R 2500/2018-4), relating to cancellation proceedings between Ultra Safety Systems and Tikal Marine Systems.

Operative part of the order

1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2.Tikal Marine Systems GmbH and Ultra Safety Systems Inc. shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(*) Language of the case: English.

ECLI:EU:C:2021:35

* * *

(1) OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia