I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
11.3.2024
(Case C-722/22, (1) Sofiyski gradski sad)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, justice and security - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA - Confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property - Third indent of Article 1 - Concept of ‘instrumentality’ - Article 2(1) - Obligation for Member States to take measures to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities from criminal offences - Vehicle used to transport excise goods without a tax marking in breach of the law)
(C/2024/1828)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
The third indent of Article 1 and Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of Crime-Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property,
must be interpreted as meaning that a vehicle used to transport excise goods without tax markings in breach of the law constitutes an ‘instrumentality’ of a criminal offence.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1828/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
*
Language of the case: Bulgarian.