- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-538/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 25 October 2016 — Kevin Joseph Devine v Air Nostrum, Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo SA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CN0538
62016CN0538
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.1.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 30/17
(Case C-538/16)
(2017/C 030/20)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Kevin Joseph Devine
Defendants: Air Nostrum, Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo SA
Questions referred
1.Is Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters to be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘matters relating to a contract’ also covers a claim for compensation made under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, brought against an operating air carrier which is not a party to the contract with the passenger concerned?
2.Insofar as Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 is applicable: When passengers are transported on two flights without any significant stopover at the connecting airport, is the final destination of the passengers to be regarded as being the place where the services were provided under the second indent of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, even if the claim advanced in the application for compensation under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 is based on the disruption of the first leg of the journey and the claim has been brought against the air carrier which operated the first flight, which is not a party to the contract of carriage?
Language of the case: German
(1) OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.
(2) OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.