EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 21 January 2004. # Tony Robinson v European Parliament. # Temporary staff - Promotion to Grade A 3 - Staff of the Parliamentary Group of the European Socialist Parties. # Case T-328/01.

ECLI:EU:T:2004:13

62001TJ0328

January 21, 2004
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Temporary staff — Promotion to Grade A 3 — Staff of the Parliamentary Group of the European Socialist Parties)

Full text in French II - 0000

Application: firstly, for annulment of the decision taken at the meeting of the Bureau of the ESP Parliamentary Group on 6 and 7 March 2001 appointing two persons to Grade A 3 and, secondly, for compensation in respect of the harm suffered by the applicant as a result of the promotion.

Held: The decision of the Bureau of the Parliamentary Group of the European Socialist Parties, adopted at its meeting on 6 and 7 March 2001, promoting Ms F. and Mr M. to Grade A 3 with effect from 1 March 2001 is annulled. The Parliament is ordered to pay the costs.

Summary

(Staff Regulations, Art. 91)

(Staff Regulations, Art. 45(1))

(Staff Regulations, Art. 45(1); Internal rules of the European Parliament on the recruitment of officials and other servants and movement from one category or service to another, Art. 10, first sentence)

5. Officials – Appeals – Action for compensation – Annulment of the contested unlawful act – Adequate compensation for non-pecuniary damage

(Staff Regulations, Art. 91)

(see para. 32)

(see para. 50)

(see para. 55)

(see para. 73)

5. The annulment of an act which has been challenged in itself constitutes appropriate and, as a rule, sufficient reparation for any non-material harm which the applicant may have suffered, particularly in the absence of any negative assessment in the contested decision of the applicant’s abilities likely to cause him damage.

(see para. 79)

See: C-343/87 Culin v Commission [1990] ECR I-225, paras 25 to 29; T-37/89 Hanning v Parliament [1990] ECR II-463, para. 83; T-60/94 Pierrat v Court of Justice [1995] ECR-SC I-A-23 and II-77, para. 62; T-282/97 and T-57/98 Giannini v Commission [1999] ECR-SC I-A-33 and II-151, para. 40

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia