- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-172/23: Action brought on 30 March 2023 — Dendiki v EUIPO — D-Market (hepsiburada)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0172
62023TN0172
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.5.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 179/69
(Case T-172/23)
(2023/C 179/96)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Dendiki BV (Roosendaal, Netherlands) (represented by: N. Ruyters and A. Klomp, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi (Istanbul, Türkiye)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark hepsiburada — European Union trade mark No 17 151 796
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 January 2023 in Case R 639/2021-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other party, should the other party intervene, to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.