EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-703/21: Action brought on 2 November 2021 — Zielonogórski Klub Żużlowy Sportowa v EUIPO — Falubaz Polska (FALUBAZ)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0703

62021TN0703

November 2, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/33

(Case T-703/21)

(2022/C 11/46)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Zielonogórski Klub Żużlowy Sportowa S.A. (Zielona Góra, Poland) (represented by: T. Grucelski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Falubaz Polska S.A. spółka komandytowo-akcyjna (Zielona Góra)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘FALUBAZ’ — EU trade mark No 14 535 835

Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 August 2021 in Case R 1681/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

order the unsuccessful party to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union and any costs necessarily incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;

in the event of intervention in the proceedings by the other party, order that party to bear its own costs.

Pleas in law

Infringements of the principle of free evaluation of evidence through an arbitrary evaluation of the evidence obtained;

Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of [Regulation (EU) 2017/1001]).

Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

* * *

Language of the case: Polish.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia