I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-262/00)(1)
(Action for annulment - State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and requiring the recovery of aid paid - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
2013/C 71/29
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: La Vigile San Marco SpA (Venice, Italy) (represented by: A. Vianello, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Italian Republic (initially represented by: U. Leanza, then by I. Braguglia, then by R. Adam, and finally by I. Bruni, Agents, assisted by G. Aiello and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50).
1.The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance;
2.The action is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law;
3.La Vigile San Marco SpA shall bear the Commission’s costs in addition to its own costs;
4.The Italian Republic shall bear its own costs.
(1)
OJ C 355, 9.12.2000