- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-140/25: Action brought on 27 February 2025 – Variuscard v EUIPO (CRYPTOSTAMP)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0140
62025TN0140
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/1907
(Case T-140/25)
(C/2025/1907)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Variuscard Produktions- und Handels GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: A. Koller, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of a European Union word mark – Application No 18 937 926
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 December 2024 in Case R 1585/2024-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul or, where appropriate, alter the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1907/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—