EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-232/24: Action brought on 3 May 2024 – Euro Asia Cargo v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0232

62024TN0232

May 3, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/3788

(Case T-232/24)

(C/2024/3788)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Euro Asia Cargo Private Ltd (Colombo, Sri Lanka) (represented by: F. Wolf and T. Ackermann, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul (i) Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/746 of 23 February 2024 (1) and (ii) Council Regulation (EU) 2024/745 of 23 February 2024, (2) in so far as those acts concern the applicant;

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the Council made an error of assessment in deciding to add the name of the applicant to Annex IV to amended Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP and Annex IV to amended Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (together, Annex IV). The applicant argues that it does not fulfil any of the criteria to be listed in Annex IV.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Council violated the principle of proportionality and unlawfully restricted the applicant’s freedom to conduct a business. The applicant argues that listing it in Annex IV is manifestly inappropriate to achieve the objective pursued.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the Council violated the applicant’s procedural fundamental right to good administration enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter. The applicant argues that the Council failed both to inform the applicant before listing it in Annex IV and to state the reasons for the decision to list the applicant.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/746 of 23 February 2024 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L, 2024/746).

Council Regulation (EU) 2024/745 of 23 February 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L, 2024/745).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia