- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-646/13: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Galați — Romania) — Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Brăila v E.S. (Reference fora preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 8(1) — Applicability of social security conventions between Member States — Repatriated refugee originating in a Member State — Completion of periods of employment within the territory of another Member State — Application for the grant of an old-age benefit — Application refused)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CB0646
62013CB0646
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.6.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 213/11
(Case C-646/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 8(1) - Applicability of social security conventions between Member States - Repatriated refugee originating in a Member State - Completion of periods of employment within the territory of another Member State - Application for the grant of an old-age benefit - Application refused))
(2015/C 213/16)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Brăila
Respondent: E.S.
Operative part of the order
Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 988/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that a bilateral convention on social security benefits for nationals of one of the signatory States who had political-refugee status within the territory of the other signatory State, which was concluded at a date on which one of the two signatory States had not yet acceded to the European Union and which does not feature in Annex II to that regulation, does not remain applicable to the situation of political refugees repatriated to their State of origin prior to the conclusion of the bilateral convention and the entry into force of that regulation.
*
Language of the case: Romanian
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.