I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-509/18) (*)
(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Applicable time periods between multiple visits by the national control authorities - Announcement of on-the-spot checks - Implied notice - Articles 25 and 26 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 - Flat rate financial correction)
(2020/C 61/33)
Language of the case: Czech
Applicant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Pavliš, O. Serdula and J. Vláčil, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis, A. Sauka and K. Walkerová, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/873 of 13 June 2018 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2018 L 152, p. 29) in so far as it excludes expenditure of a total of EUR 151 116,65 incurred by the Czech Republic under the EAFRD.
The Court:
1.Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/873 of 13 June 2018 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as the European Commission excluded under that decision expenditure of a total of EUR 151 116,65 incurred by the Czech Republic under the EAFRD;
2.Orders the Commission to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: Czech