- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-309/15 P: Judgment of the General Court of 27 October 2016 — CW v Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Psychological harassment — Duty of the administration to provide assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Provisional distancing measures — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Responsibility — Claim for damages — Decision rejecting the administrative complaint — Distortion of the evidence — Error of law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0309
62015TA0309
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.12.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 462/20
(Case T-309/15 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Psychological harassment - Duty of the administration to provide assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Provisional distancing measures - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff - Responsibility - Claim for damages - Decision rejecting the administrative complaint - Distortion of the evidence - Error of law))
(2016/C 462/24)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: CW (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Dean and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015, CW v Parliament (F-124/13, EU:F:2015:23), seeking the setting aside of that judgment.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015, CW v Parliament (F-124/13);
2.Refers the case to a chamber of the General Court other than that which ruled on the present appeal;
3.Reserves the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 270, 17.8.2015.