I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2017/C 053/43)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Marpefa, SL (Barcelona, Spain)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘VIETA’ — EU trade mark No 1 790 674
Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2016 in Case R 1010/2016-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of the principle of clarity and precision of trade mark terms.