- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
C-834/18: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Faro, Juízo do Trabalho de Portimão — Juiz 1– Portugal) — Rolibérica Lda v Autoridade para as Condições do Trabalho (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Road transport — Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 — Article 4(i) — Concept of ‘week’ — Weekly rest periods — Calculation methods)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CB0834
62018CB0834
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 280/13
(C-834/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Road transport - Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 - Article 4(i) - Concept of ‘week’ - Weekly rest periods - Calculation methods)
(2019/C 280/16)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Rolibérica Lda
Defendant: Autoridade para as Condições do Trabalho
Operative part of the order
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006, on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85, must be interpreted as meaning that ‘weekly rest period’, within the meaning of Article 8 of that regulation must not necessarily end in the course of the ‘week’, as defined in Article 4(i) of that regulation.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.
* * *