- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases C-632/19 and C-633/19: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 July 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën, Openbaar Ministerie v Metalen Galler NV (C–632/19 and C–633/19), LW–Idee GmbH (C–632/19 and C–633/19), KGH Belgium NV (C–632/19), Vollers Belgium NV (C–633/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Dumping — Importation of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China — Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 — Validity and interpretation — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual background of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CB0632
62019CB0632
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.9.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 304/3
(Joined Cases C-632/19 and C-633/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Dumping - Importation of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China - Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 - Validity and interpretation - Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual background of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2020/C 304/03)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën, Openbaar Ministerie
Defendants: Metalen Galler NV (C–632/19 and C–633/19), LW–Idee GmbH (C–632/19 and C–633/19), KGH Belgium NV (C–632/19), Vollers Belgium NV (C–633/19)
Operative part of the order
The references for a preliminary ruling made by the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (District Court of Antwerp, Belgium) by decisions of 27 March 2019 are manifestly inadmissible.
(*) Language of the case: Dutch.
* * *
(2020/C 304/03)