I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Staff case - Officials - Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance - Summary of the pleas in law in the action - Time-limit for complaints - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2008/C 209/131)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)
Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Communities (represented by: T. Kennedy, J.-M. Stenier, G. Corstens and J. Vermer, Agents)
Annulment of the decision of the appointing authority not to promote the applicant to Grade A*11 pursuant to the 2006 promotion year — Annulment of a series of decisions concerning the career of the applicant and of other officials of the Court of Auditors — Annulment of the result of the Court of Auditor's Staff Committee election of 2006 — Claim for damages
1.The action is dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and partly manifestly unfounded.
2.Mr Nijs is ordered to pay all the costs.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 56, 10.3.2007, p. 44.
ECLI:EU:C:2008:140
15