I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-201/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Public health - Rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies - Ban on exporting organic fertilisers and soil improvers derived from Category 2 material - Failure by the Commission to initiate the procedure for re-examining the ban - Action for failure to act - Proposal of draft measures putting an end to the failure to act - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 513/39)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicants: Diusa Rendering Srl (Piacenza, Italy) and Assograssi — Associazione Nazionale Produttori Grassi e Proteine Animali (Buccinasco, Italy) (represented by: M. Moretto, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi, W. Farrell and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 265 TFEU seeking a finding that the Commission unlawfully failed to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 5a of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (OJ 1999 L 184, p. 23) so as to re-examine the ban on exporting organic fertilisers and soil improvers derived from Category 2 material laid down by Article 43(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation) (OJ 2009 L 300, p. 1).
1.There is no need to adjudicate on this action.
2.The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Diusa Rendering Srl and Assograssi — Associazione Nazionale Produttori Grassi e Proteine Animali.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.