- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-867/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — RA v Court of Auditors (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2016 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 11 — Absence of staff report — Comparison of merits — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Adoption of a new decision not to promote — Obligation to state reasons — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Manifest error of assessment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0867
62019TA0867
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 310/22
(Case T-867/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2016 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 11 - Absence of staff report - Comparison of merits - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Adoption of a new decision not to promote - Obligation to state reasons - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Manifest error of assessment)
(2021/C 310/27)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: RA (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Court of Auditors (represented by: C. Lesauvage and A.-M. Feipel Cosciug, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 27 February 2019 by which the Court of Auditors decided not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 11 and, second, compensation for the damage which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders RA to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.