- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-206/15: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2016 — Intercon v Commission (Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Grant agreement relating to the project ‘Virtual Pathological Heart of the Virtual Physiological Human’ — Commission decision to require repayment of a part of the sums paid — Inadmissibility — Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of 2 May 1991 — Documents and observations made after expiry of the prescribed periods)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0206
62015TA0206
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 410/13
(Case T-206/15)(1)
((Arbitration clause - Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Grant agreement relating to the project ‘Virtual Pathological Heart of the Virtual Physiological Human’ - Commission decision to require repayment of a part of the sums paid - Inadmissibility - Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of 2 May 1991 - Documents and observations made after expiry of the prescribed periods))
(2016/C 410/16)
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Intercon Sp. z o.o. (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: B. Eger, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herbout-Borczak and S. Lejeune, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 272 TFEU and seeking a declaration, first, that the Commission infringed the provisions of the grant agreement No 224635 relating to financing the project ‘Virtual Pathological Heart of the Virtual Physiological Human (VPH2)’, and, second, that the sums paid by way of the EU financial contribution corresponded to eligible expenditure and that the amount of EUR 70 620 demanded from the applicant by the Commission’s letter of 28 January 2015 and the debit note attached as an Annex need not, therefore, be repaid.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1)Dismisses the action;
2)Orders Intercon sp. z o.o. to bear, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission.
OJ C 221, 6.7.2015.