I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark Dialoga - Genuine use of the mark - Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Determination of independent subcategories of services - Proof of genuine use - Assessment of evidence)
(C/2025/2376)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: e-dialog GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: C. Kletzer, W. Mosing and J. Muyldermans, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Dialoga Servicios Interactivos, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: L. Carlini, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 September 2023 (Case R 97/2023-5).
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 September 2023 (Case R 97/2023-5);
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders e-dialog GmbH, EUIPO and Dialoga Servicios Interactivos, SA to bear their own costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/449, 3.1.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2376/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—