EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-349/24: Order of the General Court of 28 March 2025 – WS v EUIPO (Action for annulment – Law governing the institutions – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Requests sent to EUIPO concerning the processing of the applicant’s personal data – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TB0349

62024TB0349

March 28, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/3056

10.6.2025

(Case T-349/24)

(Action for annulment - Law governing the institutions - Protection of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 - Requests sent to EUIPO concerning the processing of the applicant’s personal data - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(C/2025/3056)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: WS (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Lekan and A. Ketels-Salet, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, annulment of the alleged decisions of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) by which the latter rejected his requests submitted on 1 February 2024 and 16 February 2024, respectively, under Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 39).

Operative part of the order

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

WS shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

(1)

OJ C C/2024/5240, 2.9.2024.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3056/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia