I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Action for annulment - Law governing the institutions - Protection of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 - Requests sent to EUIPO concerning the processing of the applicant’s personal data - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3056)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: WS (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Lekan and A. Ketels-Salet, acting as Agents)
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, annulment of the alleged decisions of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) by which the latter rejected his requests submitted on 1 February 2024 and 16 February 2024, respectively, under Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 39).
The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
WS shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
—
(1)
OJ C C/2024/5240, 2.9.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3056/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—