EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-259/24, Tenergie: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (France) lodged on 12 April 2024 – S.A.S. Tenergie Développement v Directeur Régional des Douanes de Marseille, Direction Interrégionale des douanes Provence – Alpes – Côte d’Azur – Corse, Direction Régionale des Douanes de Marseille

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0259

62024CN0259

April 12, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/4310

15.7.2024

(Case C-259/24, Tenergie)

(C/2024/4310)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: S.A.S. Tenergie Développement

Defendants: Directeur Régional des Douanes de Marseille, Direction Interrégionale des douanes Provence – Alpes – Côte d’Azur – Corse, Direction Régionale des Douanes de Marseille

Questions referred

1.Where, as in the present case, the applicant company satisfies the conditions set out in Articles 119 and 120 of the Union Customs Code, must Article 116 of that code be interpreted as imposing an obligation on the competent national authorities to transmit to the European Commission the file requesting remission of the duties notified?

2.If the answer is that those national authorities have no discretion in such a case, will failure to comply with the obligation to transmit the file requesting remission to the European Commission lead to remission of the duties and penalties claimed?

3.If the answer to the second question is in the negative, does the principle that a Member State is required to make reparation for loss or damage caused to individuals as a result of a breach of European Union law – provided that breach is entirely attributable to that State – apply in situations in which that Member State has misapplied Article 116 of the Union Customs Code, where the obligation to transmit the file requesting remission of the duties which it lays down is regarded as conferring rights on individuals, that breach is sufficiently serious and there is a direct causal link between that breach and the damage sustained by the injured party?

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4310/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia