I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-499/23)
(2023/C 338/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Enterprise Holdings, Inc. (Saint Louis, Missouri, United States) (represented by: M. Forde, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Qommute SARL (Marseille, France)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word trade mark COMMUTE WITH ENTERPRISE — Application for registration No 17 925 816
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 June 2023 in Case R 1015/2022-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—in the alternative, alter the contested decision in the sense that the opposition is remitted to the Opposition Division;
—order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs in the present proceedings and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO; in the alternative, should the other party before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervene, order the defendant and intervener jointly and severally to pay the applicant’s costs in the present proceedings and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.