I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-290/10 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Action before the General Court against a decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM - Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Time-limit allowed for bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility due to delay - Appeal clearly unfounded)
2011/C 80/17
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Franssons Verkstäder AB (represented by: O. Öhlén, advokat)
Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Lindner Recyclingtech GmbH
Appeal against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 May 2010 in Case T-98/10 Franssons Verkstäder v OHIM in which the General Court dismissed an action brought by the proprietor of Community design No 253778-0001 (chaffcutters) against decision R 690/2007-3 of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 October 2009 annulling the decision of the Invalidity Division which rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity submitted by Lindner Recyclingtech — Time-limit allowed for bringing proceedings — Clear inadmissibility
The Court:
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Franssons Verkstäder AB shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.