- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-535/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureș (Romania) lodged on 21 October 2016 — Michael Tibor Bachman v FAER IFN SA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CN0535
62016CN0535
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 38/7
(Case C-535/16)
(2017/C 038/09)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Michael Tibor Bachman
Defendant: FAER IFN SA
Question referred
Must Article 2([b]) of Directive 93/13/EEC, which defines the term ‘consumer’, be interpreted as covering also a natural person who, by means of a novation agreement, has undertaken to repay to a commercial operator, which is a professional lending institution, loans originally granted to a company for purposes inherent in that company’s business activity, that is to say, for investment in the business of the carriage of goods by road, in the case where [that] natural person has no evident link with that company but acted in that way on the basis of links, outside his trade, business or profession, with the person who controlled the company which received the original loans and also with the persons who signed contracts ancillary to the original loan contracts (contracts of guarantee, contracts providing immovable property as security/mortgages)?
Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).
* * *