- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-367/23, Artemis security: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 9 June 2023 — EA v Artemis security
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0367
62023CN0367
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.9.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 321/24
(Case C-367/23, Artemis security)
(2023/C 321/29)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: EA
Defendant: Artemis security SAS
Questions referred
1.Does Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time fulfil the conditions for it to have direct effect and be relied on by a worker in a dispute concerning that worker?
2.Must Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2003/88/EC be interpreted as precluding domestic legislation or practices under which, in the event of a failure to comply with the provisions adopted to implement the measures necessary for the free assessment of a worker’s health, the worker’s right to compensation is subject to proof of the damage which would have resulted from that breach?