- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-514/22: Action brought on 24 August 2022 — Vitromed v EUIPO — Vitromed Healthcare (VITROMED Germany)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0514
62022TN0514
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.10.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 380/26
(Case T-514/22)
(2022/C 380/32)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Vitromed GmbH (Jena, Germany) (represented by: M. Linß, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vitromed Healthcare (Jaipur, India)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark VITROMED Germany — Application No 18 209 244
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2022 in Case R 1670/2021-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—reject the opposition in its entirety;
—order the opponent to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.