I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-349/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark HACKER SPACE - Earlier EU word mark HACKER-PSCHORR and earlier EU figurative mark Hacker Pschorr, as well as earlier national word marks HACKERBRÄU and HACKER - Relative ground for refusal - Identification of the ground on which the opposition is based - Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 2(2)(c) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
(2023/C 104/49)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Hacker-Pschorr Bräu GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Tenkhoff and T. Herzog, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Jana Vandělíková (Prague, Czech Republic)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 April 2022 (Case R 1268/2021-1).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
OJ C 284, 25.7.2022.