- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-16/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 13 January 2017 — TGE Gas Engineering GmbH — Sucursal em Portugal v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0016
62017CN0016
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 104/34
(Case C-16/17)
(2017/C 104/49)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: TGE Gas Engineering GmbH — Sucursal em Portugal
Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
Questions referred
Must Articles 44, 45, 132(1)(f), 167, 168, 169, 178, 179 and 192a, 193, 194 and 196 of the VAT Directive (Directive 2006/112), Articles 10 and 11 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 and the principle of neutrality be interpreted as meaning that they preclude the Portuguese tax authorities from refusing the right to deduction of VAT by a branch of a German company, in circumstances where:
the German company obtained a tax identification number in Portugal to carry out an isolated act, namely ‘acquisition of shares’, corresponding to a non-resident entity without a permanent establishment;
subsequently, the branch of that German company was registered in Portugal and was assigned its own tax number, as a permanent establishment of that company;
later, the German company, using the first identification number, entered into a contract with another company to establish an economic interest group (ACE) to carry out a works contract in Portugal;
subsequently, the branch, using its own tax number, entered into a subcontract with the ACE, setting out the reciprocal services between the branch and the ACE and agreeing that the latter would invoice the subcontractors, in the agreed proportions, for the costs which it incurred;
the ACE indicated the branch’s tax identification number in the debit notes it issued to invoice costs to that branch, and charged VAT;
the branch deducted the VAT charged in the debit notes;
the transactions of the ACE (by way of subcontracting) consist of the transactions of the branch and of the other company forming part of the ACE, these latter having invoiced to the ACE the entire revenue that the ACE invoiced to the developer?
Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax
OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 of 15 March 2011 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
OJ 2011 L 77, p. 1.