EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court of 19 March 1991. # Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Failure to implement a directive. # Case C-310/89.

ECLI:EU:C:1991:124

61989CJ0310

March 19, 1991
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61989J0310

European Court reports 1991 Page I-01381 Pub.RJ Page Pub somm

Summary

2. Measures adopted by the Community institutions - Directives - Implementation by the Member States - Need for complete transposition - Prospect of a new directive being adopted - Immaterial (EEC Treaty, Art. 189, third paragraph)

Summary

2. The Member States are bound to comply with all their obligations under an existing directive. That applies even when the adoption of a proposal for a new directive in the same field is envisaged (see the judgment in Case 220/83 Commission v France [1986] ECR 3663). In any event the binding force of a directive may not be challenged as long as it has not been abrogated or amended.

Parties

In Case C-310/89,

Commission of the European Communities, represented by René Barents, a member of its Legal Department, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Guido Berardis, also a member of the Commission' s Legal Department, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg,

applicant,

Kingdom of the Netherlands, represented by J. W. de Zwaan, Legal Adviser, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Netherlands Embassy, 5 rue C. M. Spoo,

defendant,

APPLICATION for a declaration that, by not adopting within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 84/539/EEC of 17 September 1984 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electro-medical equipment used in human or veterinary medicine (Official Journal L 300, p. 179) or at least by not informing the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty,

composed of: O. Due, President, T. F. O' Higgins, G. C. Rodríguez Iglesias and M. Díez de Velasco, Presidents of Chambers, Sir Gordon Slynn, C. N. Kakouris, R. Joliet, F. A. Schockweiler and P. J. G. Kapteyn, Judges,

(The grounds of the judgment are not reproduced.)

hereby

Operative part

(1) Declares that by not adopting within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 84/539/EEC of 17 September 1984 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electro-medical equipment used in human or veterinary medicine or at least by not informing the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty;

(2) Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia