- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-239/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — Cherusci v EUIPO — LexDellmeier (RIALTO) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark RIALTO — No genuine use of the trade mark — No proper reasons for non-use — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0239
62022TA0239
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/46
(Case T-239/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark RIALTO - No genuine use of the trade mark - No proper reasons for non-use - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 252/54)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Cherusci Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Reinhard, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: LexDellmeier Intellectual Property Law Firm (Munich, Germany) (represented by: J. Bogatz, Y. Stone and C. Dory, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 February 2022 (Case R 695/2021-2).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Cherusci Ltd to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
* * *
(1) OJ C 237, 20.6.2022.