24.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/50

(Case T-857/19)

(2020/C 61/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Franklin Dehousse (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—declare the present action admissible and well founded;

—set aside the contested decision;

—order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action against the decision of the Registrar of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 14 October 2019 concerning a measure giving effect to the judgment of 20 September 2019, Dehousse v Court of Justice of the European Union, T-433/17, EU:T:2019:632), the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 266 TFEU, in that the contested decision was not an appropriate measure to comply with the judgment in Case T-433/17, Dehousse v Court of Justice of the European Union.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the decision of the Court of 2016 on access to administrative documents, Article 15(3) TFEU and Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular public access to documents of the institutions and the duty of transparency.

3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular the right to good administration, including the duty to state reasons.