EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-1175/23: Action brought on 20 December 2023 — Siemens Healthineers v EUIPO — Sunware (teamplay)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1175

62023TN1175

December 20, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1266

12.2.2024

(Case T-1175/23)

(C/2024/1266)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Siemens Healthineers AG (Forchheim, Germany) (represented by: M. Taxhet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sunware s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark teamplay — European Union trade mark No 13 383 831

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 October 2023 in Case R 747/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision and the decision of the Cancellation Division to the extent that the trade mark at issue was declared invalid for goods and services in Classes 9 and 42;

allow the trade mark at issue to stay on the register for the above goods and services;

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs of the present proceedings and of the proceedings before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

Violation of the right to be heard as an essential formal requirement;

Infringement of Article 18(1) in conjunction with Article 64(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1266/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia