- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-96/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 May 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Niederösterreich — Austria) — VO v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Tulln (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Road transport — Working days and rest days — Digital tachographs — Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 — Working days not recorded on a driver card and no record sheets kept — National legislation requiring the driver to present an attestation from his employer in such circumstances — Validity of the form annexed to Decision 2009/959/EU)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0096
62019CA0096
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 240/17
(Case C-96/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Road transport - Working days and rest days - Digital tachographs - Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 - Working days not recorded on a driver card and no record sheets kept - National legislation requiring the driver to present an attestation from his employer in such circumstances - Validity of the form annexed to Decision 2009/959/EU)
(2020/C 240/22)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: VO
Respondent: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Tulln
Operative part of the judgment
1.The second subparagraph of Article 34(3) of Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of 4 February 2014 on tachographs in road transport, repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport is to be interpreted such that the prohibition it contains does not encompass national legislation under which the driver of a vehicle fitted with a digital tachograph is required to produce, as secondary evidence of his activities, in the absence of automatic and manual tachograph records, an attestation of activities drawn up by his employer in accordance with the form annexed to Commission Decision 2009/959/EU of 14 December 2009 amending Decision 2007/230/EC on a form concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities;
2.There is nothing arising from the examination of the second question which might affect the validity of the Commission form annexed to Decision 2009/959.
(*)
Language of the case: German
ECLI:EU:C:2020:140