I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-63/13)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark AYUR - Earlier Benelux word marks AYUS - Likelihood of confusion - Articles 8(1)(b) and 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 377/36
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Three-N-Products Private Ltd (New Delhi, India) (represented by: M. Thewes and T. Chevrier, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Munindra Holding BV (Lelystad, Netherlands)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 November 2012 (Case R 2296/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Munindra Holding BV and Three-N-Products Private Ltd.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Three-N-Products Private Ltd to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.