EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-47/11: Action brought on 15 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FN0047

62011FN0047

April 15, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/56

(Case F-47/11)

2011/C 252/123

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ZZ. (represented by W. Bode, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the dispute

Annulment of the decision to exclude the applicant from Competition EPSO AST/100/09 and request for access to information concerning the running of the competition.

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Civil Service Tribunal should:

Order the defendant to supply the applicant with full information on the running of the competition and the various tests up to the present, including the procedure for assessing tests, including, but not limited to

granting access to all documents which the defendant holds concerning the participation of the applicant in that competition including documents concerning assessment of the tests taken by the applicant.

providing full information on how the mark (12 points) which the applicant obtained in practical test (a) was arrived at.

providing information on the running of the competition in general, including the number of candidates who participated in the written and oral tests; the number of candidates who passed practical test (a); the criteria established by the selection board for assessing, for example, answer keys, criteria for the awarding of points for certain parts of the various tests, or according to which criteria for assessment; the number of points obtained by other candidates in practical tests a) and b) and information as to the manner in which those points were awarded.

Annul the defendant’s decision of 28 September 2010 and confirmatory decision of 5 April 2011, thereby allowing the applicant to continue to participate in the competition, the first stage consisting in marking the applicant’s practical test (b).

Order the defendant to pay the applicant’s extra-legal costs arising as a result of the three administrative complaints and the present action.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia