EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-242/15: Action brought on 18 May 2015 — ACDA and Others v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0242

62015TN0242

May 18, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/45

(Case T-242/15)

(2015/C 236/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Automobile Club des Avocats — ACDA (Paris, France); Organisation des Transporteurs Routiers Européens — OTRE (Bordeaux, France); Fédération française des motards en colère — FFMC (Paris); Fédération française de motocyclisme (Paris); and Union nationale des automobile clubs (Paris) (represented by: M. Lesage, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

declare their action admissible;

annul Commission Notice SA.38271 of 28 October 2014 on State Aid SA.2014/N 38271, linked to the Plan for Investment in Motorways in France, published on 20 February 2015 in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU).

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on five pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the French motorway investment plan (‘MIP’) would have the effect of granting a benefit specifically to concession-holding companies operating motorways, with the assistance of public funds.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the MIP would affect competition.

3.Third plea in law, alleging overcompensation for the expenditure incurred by concession-holding companies operating motorways, which is inconsistent with the task of general economic interest with which they are entrusted.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging a barrier to trade between the Member States.

5.Fifth plea in law, alleging that the amendments made to the MIP without a new notification having been made to the Commission since Notice SA.38271 are unlawful.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia