I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2019/C 363/33)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Healios KK (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: P. Venohr, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Helios Kliniken GmbH (Berlin, Germany)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Healios – Application for registration No 14 267 041
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2019 in Case R 341/2018-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as the appeal was allowed and the contested application was rejected;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Sufficient proofs of genuine use has not been provided, especially for ‘medical and bacteriology services’;
—There is no or low similarity of the goods and services, especially when comparing medical and bacteriology services in class 5;
—The graphic element and the perception of the relevant public was not sufficiently assessed.
—