- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-120/24, Unigames: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – Unigames UAB v Lošimų priežiūros tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Article 1(1)(e) and (f) – Concepts of technical regulation and rule on services – National legislation laying down a prohibition on encouraging participation in gambling, including remote gambling – Article 5(1) – Obligation to notify the European Commission – Amendment of that legislation extending the scope of the prohibition on encouraging gambling – No notification – Consequences)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CA0120
62024CA0120
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2500
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – ‘Unigames’ UAB v Lošimų priežiūros tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos
(Case C-120/24,
Unigames)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services - Directive (EU) 2015/1535 - Article 1(1)(e) and (f) - Concepts of ‘technical regulation’ and ‘rule on services’ - National legislation laying down a prohibition on encouraging participation in gambling, including remote gambling - Article 5(1) - Obligation to notify the European Commission - Amendment of that legislation extending the scope of the prohibition on encouraging gambling - No notification - Consequences)
(C/2025/2500)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant:
‘Unigames’ UAB
Defendant: Lošimų priežiūros tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos
Operative part of the judgment
Article 1(1)(f) of Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services
must be interpreted as meaning that national legislation that lays down a prohibition on encouraging participation in remote gambling by means of the publication of information relating to gambling on the website of a gambling operator constitutes a ‘technical regulation’ within the meaning of that provision.
Article 5(1) of Directive 2015/1535
must be interpreted as meaning that, with regard to national legislation which constitutes a ‘technical regulation’, within the meaning of Article 1(1)(f) of that directive, and which has been notified to the European Commission in accordance with that Article 5(1), an amendment to that legislation is unenforceable against economic operators where that amendment has not been notified and has the effect of extending the scope of that legislation, so that it constitutes a ‘technical regulation’ that is subject to the notification obligation laid down in the latter provision.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/3156.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2500/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—