EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 30 January 2008. # Japan Tobacco, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for the Community figurative mark CAMELO - Earlier national figurative mark CAMEL - Relative ground for refusal - No risk of profit derived unduly from, and no risk of detriment to, the distinctive character and reputation of the earlier mark - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - No infringement of the rules of the appeal procedure - Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94. # Case T-128/06.

ECLI:EU:T:2008:22

62006TJ0128

January 30, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case T-128/06)

Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for the Community figurative mark CAMELO – Earlier national figurative mark CAMEL – Relative ground for refusal – No risk of profit derived unduly from, and no risk of detriment to, the distinctive character and reputation of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No infringement of the rules of the appeal procedure – Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark enjoying a reputation – Protection of well-known earlier mark extended to dissimilar goods or services (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(5)) (see paras 56-66)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 February 2006 (Case R 669/2003‑2) concerning opposition proceedings between Japan Tobacco, Inc. and Torrefacção Camelo Lda.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Torrefacção Camelo Lda

Community trade mark sought:

Mark containing figurative elements (camel, pyramids, palm trees) and the name CAFÉ TORREFACTO CAMPO MAIOR CAMELO CAFÉ ESPECIAL PURO Torrefacção Camelo Lda CAMPO MAIOR-PORTUGAL, for goods in Class 30 – Application No 1469121

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

National figurative mark CAMEL for goods in Classes 22 and 34

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Opposition upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Decision of the Opposition Division set aside

Operative part

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Japan Tobacco, Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM);

3.Orders Torrefacção Camelo Lda to bear its own costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia